|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● |
|
|
 |
| |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Tuesday, 07/15/08
Posted 07/16/08, 06:57
am ET |
(Scroll down to see Jim's
comments below) |
|
| |
| |
|
Today's date:
Tuesday, 07/15/08 |
|
| |
Dow Jones: |
10,962 |
- 92 |
| |
NASDAQ: |
|
2,215 |
+ 2 |
| |
S&P 500: |
|
1,214 |
- 2 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Final Segment
1 Title: |
'Short
Fiction' |
|
. . . .
. |
|
Featured
Stock(s): |
No specific stock picks.
General comments (see
below).
|
|
|
After this segment, you
can see Jim's
Sudden:Death picks
here...
|
JJC: We've
been on a crusade on this
show... Finally everyone
has woken up to it...
Crusade to bring back
honest short selling...
Meaning asking the
government of the United
States to enforce the
rules, where money
managers can bet against
companys in a fair
regulated way... Today we
heard something good, but
something also uniformed
from the SEC that might
help the cause... Right
now, hedge funds, if they
don't like a stock, can
just attack it by calling
brokers and punishing the
stocks by blitzing them
down endlessly with sell
orders... Knock 'em down,
knock 'em down, knock 'em
down... In the old days,
when I sold stocks
short... I had to pick up
the phone and borrow stock
first from a broker,
before I could sell it...
Obviously you can't sell
something you don't have,
so you borrow it... If I
didn't locate the stock to
borrow it and then sell it
short, okay, and I sold
it, I would therefore fail
to deliver... I didn't
have any stock in my
account, so if I failed to
deliver because it tturns
out there was no stock to
borrow, then I would be
bought in... That's
right... The broker I sold
the stock with would
simply buy it right back
in my face, paying up
because I failed to
deliver... He would
basically do the trade
over and make me pay up
and lose money, because
obviously, when you sell
short you want it to go
down... It was
devastating... I wrote
about it in
my books... It's
devastating to be bought
in... Now here's what you
need to know... When you
bet against a stock that
is heavily shorted, you
should run the risk of
being bought in... It's
frightening... In fact,
it's the short sellers
biggest fear... No, it was
the short sellers biggest
fear... Okay?... Today,
Chris Cox, who is the SEC
Chairman, said he will no
longer allow people to
short stocks without
borrowing them first when
it comes to
Fannie Mae (FNM),
Freddie Mac (FRE)
and maybe other dealers...
He said he will ban naked
shorting... That's what it
is called when you short
without borrowing the
stock first, okay... He
said he would ban it for
Fannie and Freddie...
Okay, that's terrific,
thanks commissioner...
There is only one
problem... It's already
illegal... You, Mr.
Commissioner, just simply
haven't bothered to
enforce the law... I can
not believe this
commissioner came on
national tv and said he
was doing something
special... All he is doing
is enforcing the law that
I lived by, that everybody
lived by until this laize
faire administration came
in and said you know what,
people can short without
having to borrow first,
people don't need to have
the stock...
There are literally
hundreds of stocks that
are being shorted into
oblivion that can't be
borrowed... But nobody is
being bought in... No
short sellers are being
punished because the US
government doesn't enforce
the failure to deliver
rules that govern naked
shorting... You don't
deliver, who cares,
because the government
doesn't care either...
Maybe they woke up... The
SEC shouldn't just go over
the people who have
shorted Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac, and failed to
deliver, it should go
after all those hedgefunds
who have shorted dozens of
hard to borrow stocks and
then leaned on them... All
the SEC has to do is
enforce its own law and
that would be huge for the
market, huge for you who
own the stocks... Will
it?... I don't know...
This is the same SEC that
got rid of another crusade
of mine... The uptick
rule... I wanted that
back... It was created
because of all the short
selling that was done
'30's the bear raids...
Our fore-fathers of that
year knew much more than
we did... Getting rid of
the uptick was another
mistake... That's the one
where hedgefunds no longer
have to wait for buyers to
pay higher prices before
they can short and blitz a
stock down...
They used to have to
wait... The stock was at
$32, it'd have to wait
until $32 and a quarter...
Someone taking me up
before I short it... Now I
can knock it down... $32,
$31, $30, $29, $28, $27...
Just crush it, and scare
everybody... That's what
happens now, because the
SEC got rid of the rule...
Kudos, by the way, to
Senator Charles Schumer,
for suggesting that the
rule be brought back...
This is the same SEC that
has done mroe to empower
the shorts, to destroy
stocks and colusion in
history... This is the SEC
that has been on the short
sellers side... They have
been the shorts' biggest
friend... It is time for
the SEC to realize the
error of its ways, and
recognize what they have
done to abet the shorts to
push down stocks and knock
them into oblivion is
wrong...
Let this be the first
step, Commissioner Cox, to
recognize that you have
underregulated and failed
to prosecute your own
laws, to the detriment of
all the Mad Money viewers
who own stocks as a method
to save for retirment, for
school and for life... Mad
Money viewers, write,
email the Commissioner...
Tell them they don't need
special powers... Tell
them they just need to
enforce the law against
the bad guys... Do it
today.
. . . .
.
| |
|
| |
|
■ |
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above |
■ |
|
| |
|
|
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price
that
day |
Opening
price
next
day |
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each) |
|

|
na |
na |
na |
No specific stock picks.
General comments (see above).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
See all of tonight's stocks'
latest quotes on
Yahoo! Finance |
|
Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at
Amazon.com) |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your
donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is
MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate) |
We are serving thousands
of
new visitors every day and our costs are
growing as well. Thank you for your
support & generosity!
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
Final Segment
2 Title: |
'Technical
Analysis'
Alexander Cutler, CEO |
|
. . . .
. |
|
Featured
Stock(s): |
Eaton Corp. (ETN)
|
|
|
After this segment, you
can see Jim's
Sudden:Death picks
here... |
. . . .
.
Jim's Comments BEFORE
the interview:
Back on April 28th, during
an interview with Sandy
Cutler, the CEO of ETN,
whom I think the world of,
although the stock took a
horrible 5 point, 6.8%
beating today when it
reported... I talked about
how this company would
have great visibility...
Sure enough, today it
lowered its full-year 2008
guidance from a mid point
of $8.05 per share to
$7.85 per share based on
lowered expectations of
end market growth...
Remember, I came up with
an idea of new technology
companies, the nation that
dirty smoke stack,
industrial companies, the
notion that most people
think is cyclical, meaning
their stocks should rise
or fall with the strength
of the economy... We're
actually secular growers
with great visibility,
where we're solving the
world's problems...
Problems ranging from
reducing carbon emissions,
increasing energy
efficiency... to reducing
food spoilage... I thought
these companies, not
videogame makers in
silicon valley or the
people who put a lot of
songs on the head of a
pin, with a new technology
company because they were
innovating in important
ways, not just coming up
with better and better
games that teach your
children how to be
felons...
Now, I recommended 19
stocks as "new tech" and,
on average, they've
outperformed the S&P 500
by 5.3%... That's good,
since I started the
series... Only, you could
say that's not saying much
since the S&P was down 13%
during that same period...
Outperformance matters...
I stood up for these
stocks even after the
Street dismissed them as
old fashioned cyclical
plays, but frankly, look,
I play with an open
hand... I'm a little
worried... I'm a little
worried about them after
what everyone termed to be
ETN's "blowup" today...
ETN, with its hybrid
engines, fuel efficient
transmissions and power
quality systems, is the
consomate new tech
stock... And teh consomate
new tech stock just got
its head lopped off...
This is especially
worrisome because the
company reaffirmed its
2008 guidence not that
long ago before cutting it
today... Now, maybe
they're just being
conservative, but it's
possible that global
slowdown could hurt my new
tech stocks...
So, I need to know if it's
right for ETN to be down
6.8% today... I need to
know if the "new tech"
thesis is still sound...
The best way to do that is
to talk to the man who
actually inspired my whole
thesis in the first place,
Sandy Cutler, the
Chairman, President and
CEO of ETN...
Mr. Cutler welcome back to
Mad Money...
. . . .
.
Jim's Comments AFTER
the interview:
All right, guys, now
understand we are in a
terrible bear market where
somebody can miss by a
couple of pennies then
guide down by $.20 on a
$8.00 earnings number...
Here's what you do if you
own ETN... Maybe someone
downgradeds it tomorrow
because they're so
frightened... Buy a little
more... This company is a
great American company
that is here to stay...
But I see the
overreaction... It's the
market that's doing it,
not ETN... He's being
honest, the market is
being crazy... I like ETN,
I'm standing by it.
| |
|
| |
|
■ |
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above |
■ |
|
| |
|
|
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price
that
day |
Opening
price
next
day |
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each) |
|
 |
ETN |
74.47 |
na |
Eaton Corp. (ETN)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[
end of final segment ]
|
| |
|
| |
|
Go to the SUDDEN:DEATH
SEGMENT from
tonight's show
here >>
See current quotes on Yahoo!
Finance from
tonight's show stocks
here >> |
|
Symbol keys: |
|
 |
A Charitable Trust stock.
- An asterisk next to a
stock symbol indicates that
Jim mentioned it is a stock
that he manages within
his
charitable trust portfolio.
You can see the complete
portfolio
of stocks
here >> |
|
 |
Thumbs up - indicates
he would buy the stock or,
at the very least, not sell
| | | | | | |