|
|
|
● |
|
|
 |
| |
| |
 |
| |
|
| |
Monday, 02/11/08
Posted 02/11/08, 11:19
pm ET |
(Scroll down to see Jim's
comments below) |
|
| |
| |
|
Today's date:
Monday, 02/11/08 |
|
| |
Dow Jones: |
12,240 |
+57 |
| |
NASDAQ: |
|
2,320 |
+15 |
| |
S&P 500: |
|
1,339 |
+7 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
 |
Happy Birthday to
Jim Cramer!!
Feb. 10, 1955 -- A
Powerful 53!
( NOT 64... ) |
|
|
Opening Segment 1
Title: |
'Dow For The Count'
|
|
. . . .
. |
|
Featured Stock(s): |
No specific stock picks.
See full comments below...
See Opening Segment 2,
below...
|
|
JJC:
Yesterday (2/10/08)... I
turned 64... (actually, he
turned 53)... Better
be a young looking
64-year-old, than a young
53-year-old... And it
looks like Dow Jones has
decided to give me the
worst birthday present
ever...
This morning, they gave me
yet another reason to stop
quoting the Dow Index...
to stop treating it like
it represents the
market... Because
the guys at Dow Jones made
it perfectly clear that
they either don't have a
clue... or they're
deliberately trying to
make the Dow Jones
Industrials Index as
unrepresentative of the
economy as possible!...
And I am 100% convinced
that they're ruining this
once-great index, just to
spite me as a belated
birthday present...
They had an opportunity,
because
Altria (MO*)
is getting split up, and
has to come out of the
index... They had an
opportunity, so that the
Dow better reflected the
way things are going in
this economy...
I like to look forward,
not in the past...
. . . .
.
There are three big themes
that I think any
responsible person would
want to emphasize, if they
want to nail the future...
The growth of the natural
resources sector in
importance... and that
includes oil...
The strength of companies
that sell beyond our
borders... the
rest-of-world (i.e.,
ROW)...
And, of course, the
decline in worth and size
of the financial sector...
. . . .
.
So, of course, they do
almost the exact
opposite... but
let's not act surprised
that the new management
really bungled this one...
C'mon Rupert (Murdoch)!...
You know this stuff cold!
Make the real changes!
Get rid of the
negative-ness...
. . . .
.
As of February 19th,
Honeywell
(HON),
the quintessential ROW-er,
with a management team
that has totally embraced
the idea that exports are
the future... will
be kicked off the index...
Sheer genius, if you're
trying to make the Dow
Jones Average
irrelevant...
In one fell swoop, they
remove a stock that
represents one of the
three big themes they
should be enshrining...
And what do they add to
replace MO* - which had to
go... and HON - which
should have stayed?...
We get
Chevron (CVX)
and, of all things,
Bank of America (BAC)?...
a financial... I
guess the sector's
shrinking so fast, they
figured they had to add
another bank...
What better way to destroy
the Dow?...
. . . .
.
I'd say they had a
fantastic opportunity not
to add another financial,
but to drop one!...
American International Group
(AIG)!...
We do not need still one
more totally opaque,
hard-to-understand
financial like BAC... who
knows what they actually
own... joining the
Dow. We need AIG
out...
And, while we're talking
about this travesty
masquerading as an
insurance company, I
should do the responsible
thing, and put AIG where
it belongs...
Not on the Dow, but on the
Mad Money Wall of Shame!...
with the newest member
right here... I'm
adding the CEO, Martin
Sullivan who, the way I
see it, has shown himself
to be completely over his
head... and,
frankly, he gives
incompetence a bad name...
I'm just glad I threw AIG
in the Sell Block, back on
December 13th...
which could have saved you
from a 21% loss, even
though it was a
heavily-criticized
decision to put it in the
Sell Block...
If Sullivan doesn't
already feel like he's got
egg all over his face,
let's put it there!...
(Jim then threw an egg at
Sullivan's picture on the
Wall of Shame)...
. . . .
.
If anyone at Dow Jones had
wanted to make the Dow
more relevant, they would
have dropped AIG and added
Google-licious!...
Google Inc. (GOOG)...
another great example of a
company that's doing
business with the rest of
the world... 48% of their
sales coming from overseas
for the last three
quarters. This one
is clearly here to stay...
While we're at it, if
anyone from Dow Jones is
listening, it's time to
dump
Pfizer (PFE)!...
Pharma is another example
of an incredible shrinking
sector, yet they've got
PFE,
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)
and
Merck (MRK)
in the Dow...
Why not replace PFE with a
stock that represents a
sector that's actually
growing... Ag!...
(agriculture)... and
why not add a
Monsanto (MON)
or a
Deere (DE)...
Although, MON is more
likely to be the Seed
World centerfold next
month...
And don't forget, this Dow
Jones index contains both
Verizon
(VZ)
and
AT&T (T)...
Isn't that a little
much?... There are
only really two telcos in
this country, and both are
in the Dow?...
Quizzacle?...
What a great moment to
replace one of them... I
think VZ... with
Cisco
(CSCO),
a telco equipment provider
that's also a
rest-of-worlder...
. . . .
.
Now, I know that all the
money's indexed to the
S&P, not the Dow, so it
really doesn't matter.
It's just an exercise...
but the bottom line is...
. . . .
.
The Bottom Line!:
As long
as we're treating the Dow
like it seriously
represents the market, the
Dow Jones might as well
make a serious effort to
make sure it does just
that... At least they gave
us a good reason to throw
eggs, and make a mess!...
Which is my perogative
when I'm 64!...
[See Jim's 2nd Opening
Segment stock picks
below... ]
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
See all of tonight's stocks'
latest quotes on
Yahoo! Finance |
|
|
 |
This holiday's
hottest tech
item... The
Flip!...
Completely
tape-free
amazing
60-minute
camcorder for
less than $200 -
great for young
and old!
(and still in
stock)
more details >> |
|
Most popular
investing books ordered:
(click any book to see at
Amazon.com) |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need your help!
If you find our service valuable, your
donation is critically helpful to support
our operating costs and is
MUCH appreciated!
(click below to donate) |
We are serving thousands
of
new visitors every day and our costs are
growing as well. Thank you for your
support & generosity!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
| |
|
■ |
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above |
■ |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price
that
day |
Opening
price
next
day |
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each) |
|
|
na |
na |
na |
na |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual-Fund-Holdings.com
NEW RESOURCE!
See Ken Heebner's CGM
Focus Fund
Top 25 holdings - The No.
3 Top-Performing Mutual
Fund in 2007
|
|
Opening Segment 1
Title: |
'Military Precision'
|
|
. . . .
. |
|
Featured Stock(s): |
Raytheon Co. (RTN*)
See RTN*'s official
website
here.
See the Yahoo!
Finance profile for
RTN*
here.
See Opening Segment 2,
below...
|
|
JJC:
It's easy to feel like the
Wall Street insiders have
an edge over you, when
you're investing as a
homegamer... that
they know more...
that they have more
resources... that the game
is rigged... and the
pros will beat you
everytime...
But that's simply not
true...
Believe me, we wouldn't
have much of a show, if
that were the case...
And it's not true, because
when it comes to what goes
on in Washington, you'll
do better by reading the
Washington Post... than
you'll ever do by
listening to some of these
analysts...
. . . .
.
They all the defense
budget could not possibly be
as big this year as it is...
and could definitely not be
big next year...
Just a week ago, on the 4th,
Goldman Sachs came out with a
note on defense spending that
really freaked out everyone...
including me!...
The note had an ominous
line... 'Early
indications of slowing growth
in defense spending...'
That was the concensus on the
Street... that defense
spending would disappoint...
And, once again, when it came
to Washington, the Street got
it wrong!
. . . .
.
Today, we learned in a big
frontpage article in the
business section of the
Washington Post, that the
defense budget is huge...
Bush is asking for $515
billion in 2009...
That's a 7.5% increase over
the 2008 defense budget.
That's just a low-ball number,
according to Fred Kaplan, over
at Slate... I like it.
Our defense spending next year
will come closer to $713
billion...
This blindsided Wall Street,
which consistently
under-estimated the
President's insistence on
keeping defense spending high.
We're the world's policemen
and the fact that Congress is
totally in the pocket - or
maybe in the wallet, to be
more accurate - of the defense
contractors...
. . . .
.
The analysts covering the
defense contractors just added
no value here...
They had us worried about
program terminations, when the
actual budget that came out
didn't terminate a single
program!
. . . .
.
Now that the overall defense
budget for 2009 is much bigger
than the analysts thought,
hey... do you mind if we try
to make some money off of
it?...
And we'll do that by
exploiting one of the other
big ways that analysts screw
up...
. . . .
.
The analysts know that the
defense contractors are in
bull-market mode...
But, if you're an analyst
covering the defense
contractors, you can't just
say everything is a buy... You
have to be more negative on
something. Otherwise, it
just likes you're being
rigorous...
Even though I think the most
rigorous thing, in reality,
would be to tell everybody to
buy every defense stock...
they can't do that. They
can't just say everything's
great...
Which leads us to
Raytheon (RTN*)...
one of our favorite stocks on
this show, and something owned
by
my charitable trust...
In fairness, I did schnitzel a
little... I schnitzelled
a little RTN*... I cut it
back, off the table...
but that's only because it had
had such a great run. My
position in the stock was so
big that it would have seemed
piggish, and we know what
happens to pigs who don't
sell...
. . . .
.
The analyst at Goldman
downgraded RTN*, based on the
specifics of the company...
they were worried about free
cash flow. But the
specifics of the company have
nothing to do with why RTN*
works...
It went up, because the sector
- as a whole - was strong...
Unfortunately, again, if
you're an analyst, you can't
just say that even the worst
house in the defense
neighborhood is better than
the best house in pretty much
any other neighborhood...
There are reasons to like RTN*
specifically... like the fact
that it's got the highest
international sales in the
group... and, on Mad Money,
you know we're all about the
international or, as we call
it, ROW... rest of world...
But I think the best reason to
like the stock is that it's
not getting the love it
deserves from the Street, and
that gives you an opportunity
to buy it lower than it should
be.
. . . .
.
The Bottom Line!:
The
analysts just can't get
national security right.
Only the press can... and
I say that means buy
Raytheon Co. (RTN*)...
although, I wouldn't
necessarily
pull the
trigger here, okay?... Wait
for a pullback. It
just went up on this
"sell" to "hold"...
I think you can get RTN*
for less.
. . . .
.
[See Jim's past comments
on Mad Money about
Raytheon (RTN*),
pre-searched for you
here >>
]
| |
|
| |
|
■ |
Stock Snapshots - Includes
all stocks mentioned above |
■ |
|
| |
|
|
Jim
Cramer's
rating on
this stock |
STOCK
SYMBOL |
Closing
price
that
day |
Opening
price
next
day |
Full Company
Name/Comments
(see comments above for
each) |
|
|
RTN* |
67.05 |
67.25 |
Raytheon Co. (RTN*)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Go to the LIGHTNING ROUND from
tonight's show
here >>
See current quotes on Yahoo!
Finance from
tonight's show stocks
here >> |
|
Symbol keys: |
|
 |
A Charitable Trust stock.
- An asterisk next to a
stock symbol indicates that
Jim mentioned it is a stock
that he manages within
his
charitable trust portfolio.
You can see the complete
portfolio
of stocks
here >> |
|
|
Thumbs up - indicates
he would buy the stock or,
at the very least, not sell
the stock. We do our
best to interpret Jim's
opinion on stocks, as we
think it is indicated by his
comments during the show.
Please read his comments to
decide for yourself. |
|
 |
Thumbs down -
indicates he has said not to
buy or to sell the stock,
based on his comments
We do our best to interpret
Jim's opinion on stocks, as
we think it is indicated by
his comments during the
show. Please read his
comments to decide for
yourself. |
|
 |
Back up the truck -
indicated by Jim, when he
says the stock is so good,
that he would do a
'mon-back' on the stock...
In other words, this is the
sound someone would say to a
truck driver, "Come on
back... " as he is "backing
up the truck" to load up on
his cargo. Translation
for buying stocks:
This recommendation by Jim
indicates that, after you do
your own
homework on the stock,
you should feel comfortable
loading up on it, as it is
in a good position to be
bought at this point. |
|
 |
Stumped. - Of the
2,000+ stocks that Jim
Cramer has in his head, for
which he has an informed
opinion, he sometimes comes
across a caller with a stock
he does not know well enough
to opine on... He then
indicates he is stumped and
will have to come back to
it, after he does some
homework of his own on
the stock. This
usually occurs during the
Lightning Round, when Jim
does not know in advance who
is calling, or what their
stock question is about. |
|
|
|
|
|
Definitions of key phrases
used by Jim, known as
"Cramerisms": |
|
 |
Definition: 'Pull the
trigger' is Jim's phrase for making
the decision at that point to trade -
either to 'buy' or
to 'sell' (although he
usually uses the phrase for
buying), as if to say you
should feel comfortable
enough to make the final
decision without looking
back... |
|
|
Definition: 'Ring
the Register' is Jim's phrase for
selling a stock, and making
it a final sale, that you
should not look back on.
Put it behind you. |
|
|
Definition: 'Let It Come In' indicates how you
may wait for it to pull back, or have the
stock price come down briefly, as your
chance (after letting it come in) to buy
the rest of your position (i.e., total
number of shares you own in that stock). |
|
|
Definition: 'backing it up'
or 'doing a 'mon-back' is Jim's
phrase for the metaphor of backing up a
truck to load up on a stock by buying
it. 'Mon-back is short for the
imaginary worker saying, 'Come on
back...' as the truck is backing up to
receive its load... Notice that we use
the little truck icon to indicate where
Jim has mentioned this.
Translation for buying
stocks: This
recommendation by Jim
indicates that, after you do
your own
homework on the stock,
you should feel comfortable
loading up on it, as it is
in a good position to be
bought at this point. |
| |
 |
See more
"Cramerisms" & other
financial phrases
here >> |
|
|
|
|
|
Helpful Websites: |
|
|
See the stocks currently
known to be in Jim Cramer's
Charitable Trust at:
jim-cramer-charitable-trust-stocks.com |
|
|
|
|
|
See the stocks currently
known to be in Warren
Buffett's portfolio
of
stocks at:
warren-buffett-portfolio.com |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Homework 101:
This is an excellent
upcoming site that provides
resources and links to help
you do that homework that
Jim Cramer recommends after
hearing his suggestions...
StockHomework101.com
This site is coming soon.
Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
FastMoneyRecap:
This site will be a quick
summary of recommendations
made by the great Fast Money
TV show crew, that will
offer you a unique service,
to compare their picks to
Jim Cramer's past comments
about those stocks.
Fast Money Recap - Trades
for next day...
Compare these picks to Jim's
comments for the same
stocks. |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
© 2005-2007 MadMoneyRecap.com ■
Important disclaimer: This site is
not affiliated with Mr. James
Cramer, and is not associated with
any television networks or
broadcasts. Please note that all
thumbs up or thumbs down
indicators are not always clearly
indicated on the show and are
interpreted by us as accurately as
possible. Some comments have been
edited for brevity and clarity,
and extraneous material omitted. Please rely on watching
the show yourself, doing
your own homework,
and reading the text of the
comments to draw your own
conclusions. Also, data presented
on this site should not be used to
make investment decisions and
accuracy, although attempted,
cannot be guaranteed. Please
consult with your own financial
advisor for professional advice. |
|
|
 |
|
|
